Model Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 4.5Which is better in 2026?
Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3.1 Pro is 1.1x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 — which is better?
Gemini 3.1 Pro (by Google) and Claude Sonnet 4.5 (by Anthropic) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMLU), while Claude Sonnet 4.5 is better at 0 benchmarks. Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Gemini 3.1 Pro is roughly 1.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 3.1 Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 1.1x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 if…
- you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMLU), while Claude Sonnet 4.5 is better at 0 benchmarks.
Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3.1 Pro ($2.50/1M tokens) is 1.2x cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.5 ($3.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3.1 Pro ($15.00/1M tokens) costs the same as Claude Sonnet 4.5 ($15.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is more expensive than Gemini 3.1 Pro.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 3.1 Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude Sonnet 4.5's 200,000 tokens. Gemini 3.1 Pro can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude Sonnet 4.5 support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 was released on 2025-09-29.
Gemini 3.1 Pro is 5 months newer than Claude Sonnet 4.5.
Feb 19, 2026
3 months ago
4mo newerSep 29, 2025
8 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Both models have the same knowledge cutoff date of 2025-01-31.
They should have similar awareness of historical events and information up to this date.
Jan 2025
Jan 2025
Provider Availability
Gemini 3.1 Pro is available from Google. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is available from Anthropic.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude Sonnet 4.5
View detailsAnthropic
No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 4.5.