Model Comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Muse Spark

Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

9 benchmarks

Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms in 7 benchmarks (ARC-AGI v2, GPQA, LiveCodeBench Pro, MMMU-Pro, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Muse Spark is better at 2 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, Humanity's Last Exam).

Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 09 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerGoogle
Meta
Muse Spark
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Meta
Muse Spark
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Apr 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Muse Spark support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Spark

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19, while Muse Spark was released on 2026-04-08.

Muse Spark is 2 months newer than Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Feb 19, 2026

1 months ago

Muse Spark

Apr 8, 2026

1 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.1 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Muse Spark's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Jan 2025

Muse Spark

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Higher ARC-AGI v2 score (77.1% vs 42.5%)
Higher GPQA score (94.3% vs 89.5%)
Higher LiveCodeBench Pro score (96.2% vs 80.0%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (80.5% vs 80.4%)
Higher SWE-Bench Pro score (54.2% vs 52.4%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.6% vs 77.4%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (68.5% vs 59.0%)
Meta
Higher GDPval-AA score (48.1% vs 43.9%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (58.4% vs 51.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Meta
Muse Spark

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Muse Spark

Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3.1 Pro is made by Google and Muse Spark is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 3.1 Pro scores t2-bench: 99.3%, LiveCodeBench Pro: 96.2%, GPQA: 94.3%, MMMLU: 92.6%, BrowseComp: 85.9%. Muse Spark scores Tau2 Telecom: 91.5%, GPQA: 89.5%, CharXiv-R: 86.4%, ScreenSpot Pro: 84.1%, IPhO 2025: 82.6%.
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Spark supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Gemini 3.1 Pro is developed by Google and Muse Spark is developed by Meta.