The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Gemini 3.8 Flash are closely matched at 38.8 and 51.0 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Gemini 3.8 Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 38.8 and 51.0.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
38.8
#61
51.0
#15
Coding
31.9
#38
39.3
#14
Agents
27.2
#39
35.8
#16
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.75 / M
Output price
— / M
$3.75 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber · 13 for Gemini 3.8 Flash

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Gemini 3.8 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.8 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.8 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber does not.

Gemini 3.8 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-07-21, while Gemini 3.8 Flash was released on 2026-09-02.

Gemini 3.8 Flash is 1 month newer than Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Jul 21, 2026

1 months ago

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Sep 2, 2026

3 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.8 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.8 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

—

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Mar 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Gemini 3.8 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber vs Gemini 3.8 Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber or Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Gemini 3.8 Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 38.8 and 51.0. Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Gemini 3.8 Flash is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber compare to Gemini 3.8 Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber scores CyberGym: 83.2%. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.4%, LVBench: 87.1%, CharXiv-R: 86.2%, LABBench2: 86.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (38.8 vs 51.0), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons