The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are closely matched at 37.6 and 45.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 37.6 and 45.7.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2.6-Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
Google
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
37.6
#70
45.7
#29
Coding
30.2
#54
36.6
#22
Agents
26.9
#49
33.3
#25
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

1 shared

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash is better at 1 benchmark (CyberGym).

MiMo-V2.6-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-07-21, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2 months newer than Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Jul 21, 2026

2 months ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 37.6 and 45.7. Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is made by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber scores CyberGym: 83.2%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (37.6 vs 45.7), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons