The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads the LLM Stats Score 29.9 to -10.6.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads the overall LLM Stats Score 29.9 to -10.6, ranking #123 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

  • overall performance matters — it scores 29.9 and ranks #123 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
29.9
#123
-10.6
#367
Reasoning
25.9
#148
-11.0
#359
Coding
16.0
#127
-4.4
#256
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Output price
$2.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite · 18 for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 3n E2B Instructeddon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-07-21, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 13 months newer than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Jul 21, 2026

1 months ago

1.1yr newer
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has more recent training data (up to 2026-03-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E2B Instructed (2024-06-01).

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Mar 2026

1.8 yr newer
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Gemma 3n E2B Instructed?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads the LLM Stats Score 29.9 to -10.6. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is made by Google and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite compare to Gemma 3n E2B Instructed in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores CharXiv-R: 76.5%, OSWorld-Verified: 74.0%, SWE-Bench Pro: 54.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 54.0%, MLE-Bench: 39.2%. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed scores HumanEval: 66.5%, MMLU: 60.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 59.0%, MBPP: 56.6%, Global-MMLU: 55.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (29.9 vs -10.6). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons