The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Hy4 preview

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 30.1.

Google · Tencent · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Hy4 preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 30.1, ranking #14 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Hy4 preview wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output

Choose Hy4 preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.1 and ranks #14 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
30.1
#113
51.1
#14
26.1
#139
50.7
#11
16.2
#120
39.8
#12
15.4
#78
36.3
#14
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Output price
$2.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite · 32 for Hy4 preview

2 shared

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Hy4 preview is better at 2 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.1).

Hy4 preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Tencent
Hy4 preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy4 preview does not.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Hy4 preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is licensed under a proprietary license, while Hy4 preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Hy4 preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-07-21, while Hy4 preview was released on 2026-08-28.

Hy4 preview is 1 month newer than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Jul 21, 2026

1 months ago

Hy4 preview

Aug 28, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Hy4 preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Hy4 preview's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Mar 2026

Hy4 preview

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Hy4 preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
Hy4 preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Hy4 preview.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 30.1. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is made by Google and Hy4 preview is made by Tencent. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite compare to Hy4 preview in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores CharXiv-R: 76.5%, OSWorld-Verified: 74.0%, SWE-Bench Pro: 54.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 54.0%, MLE-Bench: 39.2%. Hy4 preview scores GPQA: 92.3%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.4%, WideSearch: 83.9%, MCP Atlas: 83.7%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 82.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Hy4 preview?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens and Hy4 preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Hy4 preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (30.1 vs 51.1), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Hy4 preview?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is developed by Google and Hy4 preview is developed by Tencent.