The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads the LLM Stats Score 29.9 to 3.8.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads the overall LLM Stats Score 29.9 to 3.8, ranking #123 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

  • overall performance matters — it scores 29.9 and ranks #123 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
29.9
#123
3.8
#305
Reasoning
25.9
#148
3.3
#300
Coding
16.0
#127
3.9
#213
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Output price
$2.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite · 16 for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen2.5 14B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-07-21, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 22 months newer than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Jul 21, 2026

1 months ago

1.8yr newer
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 14B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Mar 2026

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads the LLM Stats Score 29.9 to 3.8. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is made by Google and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite compare to Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores CharXiv-R: 76.5%, OSWorld-Verified: 74.0%, SWE-Bench Pro: 54.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 54.0%, MLE-Bench: 39.2%. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores GSM8k: 94.8%, HumanEval: 83.5%, MBPP: 82.0%, MATH: 80.0%, MMLU-Redux: 80.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (29.9 vs 3.8), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is developed by Google and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons