The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 45.5 to 29.9. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 2.2x cheaper per token.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.7 Max leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.5 to 29.9, ranking #28 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.7 Max wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is roughly 2.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

  • cost matters — it's about 2.2x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Qwen3.7 Max

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.5 and ranks #28 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
29.9
#123
45.5
#28
Reasoning
25.9
#148
46.1
#26
Coding
16.0
#127
36.2
#22
Agents
15.5
#83
29.3
#37
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.30 / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
$2.50 / M
$3.75 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Qwen3.7 Max
Vision
19.5#73
25.3#46
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite · 42 for Qwen3.7 Max

1 shared

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.7 Max is better at 1 benchmark (SWE-Bench Pro).

Qwen3.7 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite ($0.30/1M tokens) is 4.2x cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite ($2.50/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max ($3.75/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3.7 Max is more expensive than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$2.50
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3.7 Max's 1,000,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3.7 Max does not.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.7 Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.7 Max

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-07-21, while Qwen3.7 Max was released on 2026-05-19.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 2 months newer than Qwen3.7 Max.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Jul 21, 2026

1 months ago

2mo newer
Qwen3.7 Max

May 19, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Qwen3.7 Max's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.7 Max's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Mar 2026

Qwen3.7 Max

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is available from Google. Qwen3.7 Max is available from Novita, DeepInfra, Together.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

Qwen3.7 Max

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen3.7 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.7 Max
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.7 Max.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 45.5 to 29.9. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is made by Google and Qwen3.7 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite compare to Qwen3.7 Max in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores CharXiv-R: 76.5%, OSWorld-Verified: 74.0%, SWE-Bench Pro: 54.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 54.0%, MLE-Bench: 39.2%. Qwen3.7 Max scores HMMT Feb 26: 97.1%, Kernel Bench L3: 96.0%, MMLU-Redux: 95.0%, IFEval: 94.3%, GPQA: 92.4%.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 4.2x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output via google. Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.25/M input and $3.75/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen3.7 Max?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.7 Max supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen3.7 Max?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (29.9 vs 45.5), context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.30 vs $1.25/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen3.7 Max?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is developed by Google and Qwen3.7 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons