Model Comparison

Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.7 MaxWhich is better in 2026?

Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Max is 3.2x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.7 Max — which is better?

Kimi K3 (by Moonshot AI) and Qwen3.7 Max (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Kimi K3 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MCP Atlas), while Qwen3.7 Max is better at 0 benchmarks. Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Qwen3.7 Max is roughly 3.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Kimi K3 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Kimi K3 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Qwen3.7 Max if…

  • cost matters — it's about 3.2x cheaper per token

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Kimi K3 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MCP Atlas), while Qwen3.7 Max is better at 0 benchmarks.

Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.7 Max costs less

For input processing, Kimi K3 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 2.4x more expensive than Qwen3.7 Max ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Kimi K3 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 4.0x more expensive than Qwen3.7 Max ($3.75/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Kimi K3 is more expensive than Qwen3.7 Max.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Kimi K3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3.7 Max's 1,000,000 tokens. Kimi K3 can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Qwen3.7 Max is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Kimi K3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3.7 Max does not.

Kimi K3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Kimi K3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.7 Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K3 was released on 2026-07-16, while Qwen3.7 Max was released on 2026-05-19.

Kimi K3 is 2 months newer than Qwen3.7 Max.

Kimi K3

Jul 16, 2026

5 days ago

1mo newer
Qwen3.7 Max

May 19, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Kimi K3 is available from Moonshot AI. Qwen3.7 Max is available from Novita, Together.

Kimi K3

moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Qwen3.7 Max

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Has open weights
Higher GDPval-AA score (55.6% vs 43.6%)
Higher GPQA score (93.5% vs 92.4%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (56.0% vs 41.4%)
Higher MCP Atlas score (84.2% vs 76.4%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.7 Max

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi K3 and Qwen3.7 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi K3
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.7 Max
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.7 Max.

Which is better, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Kimi K3 is made by Moonshot AI and Qwen3.7 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Kimi K3 compare to Qwen3.7 Max in benchmarks?

Kimi K3 scores MathVision: 97.8%, DeepSearchQA: 95.0%, GPQA: 93.5%, CharXiv-R: 91.3%, BrowseComp: 91.2%. Qwen3.7 Max scores HMMT Feb 26: 97.1%, Kernel Bench L3: 96.0%, MMLU-Redux: 95.0%, IFEval: 94.3%, GPQA: 92.4%.

Is Kimi K3 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is 2.4x cheaper for input tokens. Kimi K3 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via moonshot. Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.25/M input and $3.75/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Kimi K3 and Qwen3.7 Max?

Kimi K3 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.7 Max supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Kimi K3 and Qwen3.7 Max?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($3.00 vs $1.25/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi K3 and Qwen3.7 Max?

Kimi K3 is developed by Moonshot AI and Qwen3.7 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.