Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Max
Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3.7 Max are closely matched at 43.6 and 46.0 on the LLM Stats Score. Qwen3.7 Max is 1.8x cheaper per token.
Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3.7 Max are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 43.6 and 46.0.
In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3.5 Flash wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Qwen3.7 Max is roughly 1.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 3.5 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 6 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
Choose Qwen3.7 Max
- cost matters — it's about 1.8x cheaper per token
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
16 reported for Gemini 3.5 Flash · 42 for Qwen3.7 Max
Gemini 3.5 Flash outperforms in 4 benchmarks (Finance Agent v2, LiveBench, MCP Atlas, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Qwen3.7 Max is better at 2 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Pro).
Gemini 3.5 Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3.5 Flash ($1.50/1M tokens) is 1.2x more expensive than Qwen3.7 Max ($1.25/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3.5 Flash ($9.00/1M tokens) is 2.4x more expensive than Qwen3.7 Max ($3.75/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 3.5 Flash is more expensive than Qwen3.7 Max.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3.7 Max's 1,000,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 65,536 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Gemini 3.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3.7 Max does not.
Gemini 3.5 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Qwen3.7 Max
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Both models were released on 2026-05-19.
They likely represent similar generations of model development.
May 19, 2026
3 months ago
May 19, 2026
3 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-01-31, while Qwen3.7 Max's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3.5 Flash's training data extends to 2026-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.7 Max's cutoff date.
Jan 2026
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 3.5 Flash is available from Google. Qwen3.7 Max is available from Novita, Together.
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Qwen3.7 Max
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3.7 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Max.