The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads the LLM Stats Score 49.2 to 45.6.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.2 to 45.6, ranking #18 overall.

In the 8 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next wins 6; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen3.7 Max

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.25/M input and $3.75/M output

Choose Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.2 and ranks #18 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 6 of 8 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
45.6
#26
49.2
#18
Reasoning
46.2
#25
48.9
#18
Coding
36.3
#21
36.2
#22
Agents
29.3
#36
35.0
#18
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 8
6 of 8
Input price
$1.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Math
43.1#3
32.8#54
Vision
25.2#45
34.1#13
Tool use
27.5#22
30.9#11
Productivity
8.0#9
15.3#2
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

42 reported for Qwen3.7 Max · 22 for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

8 shared

Qwen3.7 Max outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam), while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 6 benchmarks (CoWorkBench, IFBench, LiveCodeBench v6, NL2Repo, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Pro).

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.7 Max specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Qwen3.7 Max specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3.7 Max does not.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen3.7 Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen3.7 Max is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next uses Qwen Community License 1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen3.7 Max

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen Community License 1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.7 Max was released on 2026-05-19, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 3 months newer than Qwen3.7 Max.

Qwen3.7 Max

May 19, 2026

3 months ago

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Aug 26, 2026

2 weeks ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3.7 Max and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3.7 Max
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Which is better, Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads the LLM Stats Score 49.2 to 45.6. Qwen3.7 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Qwen3.7 Max compare to Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in benchmarks?

Qwen3.7 Max scores HMMT Feb 26: 97.1%, Kernel Bench L3: 96.0%, MMLU-Redux: 95.0%, IFEval: 94.3%, GPQA: 92.4%. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3.7 Max and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Qwen3.7 Max supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3.7 Max and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.6 vs 49.2), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Qwen Community License 1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons