The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 42.5.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 42.5, ranking #4 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 4 Argon wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.50/M input and $7.50/M output

Choose Gemini 4 Argon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.1 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.5
#57
55.1
#4
Reasoning
39.4
#68
52.4
#7
Coding
26.9
#73
44.1
#4
Agents
26.2
#56
40.5
#4
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$1.50 / M
— / M
Output price
$7.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Gemini 4 Argon
Vision
31.7#27
36.8#8
Multimodal
33.0#21
36.9#8
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Gemini 3.6 Flash · 19 for Gemini 4 Argon

1 shared

Gemini 3.6 Flash outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 4 Argon is better at 1 benchmark (DeepSWE 1.1).

Gemini 4 Argon significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.6 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.6 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Google
Gemini 4 Argon
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemini 4 Argon support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 4 Argon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 4 Argon

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.6 Flash was released on 2026-07-21, while Gemini 4 Argon was released on 2026-09-30.

Gemini 4 Argon is 2 months newer than Gemini 3.6 Flash.

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Jul 21, 2026

2 months ago

Gemini 4 Argon

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.6 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Gemini 4 Argon's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.6 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 4 Argon's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Mar 2026

Gemini 4 Argon

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemini 4 Argon side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.6 Flash
✓ Preferred
Gemini 4 Argon
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon.

Which is better, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 42.5. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google and Gemini 4 Argon is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.6 Flash compare to Gemini 4 Argon in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.6 Flash scores CharXiv-R: 89.4%, OSWorld-Verified: 83.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 78.0%, MLE-Bench: 63.9%, SWE-Bench Pro: 58.7%. Gemini 4 Argon scores Graphwalks BFS <128k: 99.7%, Vibe Code Bench: 91.9%, LVBench: 91.7%, LABBench2: 88.8%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 84.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 3.6 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Gemini 4 Argon supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemini 4 Argon?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.5 vs 55.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons