The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemma 3 4B

Comparing Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 3 4B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 3 4B trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, Gemma 3 4B is roughly 60.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3.7 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Gemma 3 4B

  • cost matters — it's about 60.0x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Google
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.75 / M
$0.02 / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
$0.04 / M
Context window
1,048,576
131,072
Released
Aug 2026
Mar 2025
License
Proprietary
Gemma

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 3 4Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 4B costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.7 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens) is 37.5x more expensive than Gemma 3 4B ($0.02/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.7 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens) is 93.8x more expensive than Gemma 3 4B ($0.04/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.7 Flash is more expensive than Gemma 3 4B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input tokens$0.75
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerGoogle
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input tokens$0.02
Output tokens$0.04
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemma 3 4B's 131,072 tokens. Gemma 3 4B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 3.7 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 3 4B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3 4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.7 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3 4B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.7 Flash was released on 2026-08-13, while Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12.

Gemini 3.7 Flash is 17 months newer than Gemma 3 4B.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Aug 13, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.4yr newer
Gemma 3 4B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.7 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Gemma 3 4B has a cutoff of 2024-08-01.

Gemini 3.7 Flash has more recent training data (up to 2026-03-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3 4B (2024-08-01).

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Mar 2026

1.6 yr newer
Gemma 3 4B

Aug 2024

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.7 Flash is available from Google. Gemma 3 4B is available from DeepInfra.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M

Gemma 3 4B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.02/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.04/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 3 4B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3 4B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemma 3 4B.

Which is better, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Gemma 3 4B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google) and Gemma 3 4B (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 3.7 Flash compare to Gemma 3 4B in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 97.0%, Harvey LAB-AA: 90.7%, CharXiv-R: 88.7%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.8%, LVBench: 85.4%. Gemma 3 4B scores IFEval: 90.2%, GSM8k: 89.2%, DocVQA: 75.8%, MATH: 75.6%, AI2D: 74.8%.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash cheaper than Gemma 3 4B?

Gemma 3 4B is 37.5x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75/M input and $3.75/M output via google. Gemma 3 4B costs $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 3 4B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 3 4B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 3 4B?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($0.75 vs $0.02/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons