The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 4B vs GLM-5.3

Comparing Gemma 3 4B and GLM-5.3 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · Zhipu AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 3 4B and GLM-5.3 trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, Gemma 3 4B is roughly 86.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GLM-5.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 4B

  • cost matters — it's about 86.0x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose GLM-5.3

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3 4B
Google
GLM-5.3
Zhipu AI
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.02 / M
$1.40 / M
Output price
$0.04 / M
$4.40 / M
Context window
131,072
1,000,000
Released
Mar 2025
Aug 2026
License
Gemma
Unknown

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3 4B and GLM-5.3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 4B costs less

For input processing, Gemma 3 4B ($0.02/1M tokens) is 70.0x cheaper than GLM-5.3 ($1.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemma 3 4B ($0.04/1M tokens) is 110.0x cheaper than GLM-5.3 ($4.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5.3 is more expensive than Gemma 3 4B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input tokens$0.02
Output tokens$0.04
Best providerDeepinfra
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input tokens$1.40
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

749.0B diff

GLM-5.3 has 749.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 4B, making it 18725.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 4B
4.0Bparameters
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
753.0Bparameters
4.0B
Gemma 3 4B
753.0B
GLM-5.3

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5.3 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3 4B's 131,072 tokens. Gemma 3 4B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GLM-5.3 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5.3 does not.

Gemma 3 4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3 4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-5.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12, while GLM-5.3 was released on 2026-08-14.

GLM-5.3 is 17 months newer than Gemma 3 4B.

Gemma 3 4B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

GLM-5.3

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.4yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3 4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while GLM-5.3's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3 4B's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without GLM-5.3's cutoff date.

Gemma 3 4B

Aug 2024

GLM-5.3

—

Provider Availability

Gemma 3 4B is available from DeepInfra. GLM-5.3 is available from ZAI.

Gemma 3 4B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.02/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.04/1M

GLM-5.3

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 4B and GLM-5.3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 4B
✓ Preferred
GLM-5.3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 4B vs GLM-5.3.

Which is better, Gemma 3 4B or GLM-5.3?

Gemma 3 4B (Google) and GLM-5.3 (Zhipu AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemma 3 4B compare to GLM-5.3 in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 4B scores IFEval: 90.2%, GSM8k: 89.2%, DocVQA: 75.8%, MATH: 75.6%, AI2D: 74.8%. GLM-5.3 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.2%, CyberGym: 84.5%, FrontierSWE: 78.1%, Toolathlon: 73.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 66.9%.

Is Gemma 3 4B cheaper than GLM-5.3?

Gemma 3 4B is 70.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemma 3 4B costs $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output via deepinfra. GLM-5.3 costs $1.40/M input and $4.40/M output via z.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 4B and GLM-5.3?

Gemma 3 4B supports 131K tokens and GLM-5.3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 4B and GLM-5.3?

Key differences include context window (131K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.02 vs $1.40/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 4B and GLM-5.3?

Gemma 3 4B is developed by Google and GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI.

Related comparisons