The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemma 3n E2B

Comparing Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 3n E2B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 3n E2B trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Gemma 3n E2B

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google
Gemma 3n E2B
Google
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.75 / M
— / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—
Released
Aug 2026
Jun 2025
License
Proprietary
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 3n E2Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.7 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E2B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 3n E2B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E2B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.7 Flash was released on 2026-08-13, while Gemma 3n E2B was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemini 3.7 Flash is 14 months newer than Gemma 3n E2B.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Aug 13, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.1yr newer
Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.7 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Gemma 3n E2B has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Gemini 3.7 Flash has more recent training data (up to 2026-03-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E2B (2024-06-01).

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Mar 2026

1.8 yr newer
Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 3n E2B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E2B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemma 3n E2B.

Which is better, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Gemma 3n E2B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google) and Gemma 3n E2B (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 3.7 Flash compare to Gemma 3n E2B in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 97.0%, Harvey LAB-AA: 90.7%, CharXiv-R: 88.7%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.8%, LVBench: 85.4%. Gemma 3n E2B scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 3n E2B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 3n E2B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Related comparisons