The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E2B vs Grok 4.6

Comparing Gemma 3n E2B and Grok 4.6 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 3n E2B and Grok 4.6 trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Grok 4.6

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$6.00 / M
Context window
500,000
Released
Jun 2025
Aug 2026
License
Proprietary
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E2B and Grok 4.6don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok 4.6 specifies input context (500,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E2B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
xAI
Grok 4.6
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E2B and Grok 4.6 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemma 3n E2B

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B was released on 2025-06-26, while Grok 4.6 was released on 2026-08-12.

Grok 4.6 is 14 months newer than Gemma 3n E2B.

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

Grok 4.6

Aug 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Grok 4.6 has a cutoff of 2026-02-01.

Grok 4.6 has more recent training data (up to 2026-02-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E2B (2024-06-01).

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 2024

Grok 4.6

Feb 2026

1.7 yr newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B and Grok 4.6 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B
✓ Preferred
Grok 4.6
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B vs Grok 4.6.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B or Grok 4.6?

Gemma 3n E2B (Google) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemma 3n E2B compare to Grok 4.6 in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. Grok 4.6 scores CursorBench v3.2: 69.9%, DeepSWE 1.1: 65.9%, FrontierCode: 61.3%, AA-Index: 61.0%, GDPval-AA: 58.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E2B and Grok 4.6?

Gemma 3n E2B supports an unknown number of tokens and Grok 4.6 supports 500K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B and Grok 4.6?

Gemma 3n E2B is developed by Google and Grok 4.6 is developed by xAI.