The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Hy3

Gemini 3.7 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 50.9 to 42.9.

Google · Tencent · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.7 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.9 to 42.9, ranking #13 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3.7 Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.9 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Hy3

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google
Hy3
Tencent
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
50.9
#13
42.9
#39
Reasoning
49.2
#15
42.9
#37
Coding
38.6
#17
35.0
#27
Agents
35.9
#15
28.2
#36
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.75 / M
— / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Hy3
Tool use
28.8#15
23.2#39
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Gemini 3.7 Flash · 31 for Hy3

1 shared

Gemini 3.7 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Hy3 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.7 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Tencent
Hy3
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy3 does not.

Gemini 3.7 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Hy3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.7 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Hy3 uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Hy3

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.7 Flash was released on 2026-08-13, while Hy3 was released on 2026-07-06.

Gemini 3.7 Flash is 1 month newer than Hy3.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Aug 13, 2026

2 weeks ago

1mo newer
Hy3

Jul 6, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.7 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Hy3's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.7 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Hy3's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Mar 2026

Hy3

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.7 Flash and Hy3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
✓ Preferred
Hy3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Hy3.

Which is better, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Hy3?

Gemini 3.7 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 50.9 to 42.9. Gemini 3.7 Flash is made by Google and Hy3 is made by Tencent. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.7 Flash compare to Hy3 in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 97.0%, Harvey LAB-AA: 90.7%, CharXiv-R: 88.7%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.8%, LVBench: 85.4%. Hy3 scores DeepSearchQA: 91.0%, GPQA: 90.4%, IMO-AnswerBench: 90.0%, BrowseComp: 84.2%, MCP Atlas: 79.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.7 Flash and Hy3?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Hy3 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.7 Flash and Hy3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.9 vs 42.9), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.7 Flash and Hy3?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is developed by Google and Hy3 is developed by Tencent.

Related comparisons