The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Hy3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads the LLM Stats Score 49.1 to 43.2.

Tencent · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.1 to 43.2, ranking #20 overall.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Hy3

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.14/M input and $0.58/M output

Choose Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.1 and ranks #20 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 5 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
43.2
#41
49.1
#20
43.1
#42
48.9
#19
33.2
#35
36.1
#23
27.2
#44
35.1
#20
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 5
5 of 5
Input price
$0.14 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.58 / M
— / M
Context window
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Hy3
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
36.9#33
32.7#56
21.4#50
31.1#11
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

31 reported for Hy3 · 22 for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

5 shared

Hy3 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 5 benchmarks (GPQA, NL2Repo, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Pro, Toolathlon).

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Sep 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

170.0B diff

Hy3 has 170.0B more parameters than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, making it 136.0% larger.

Tencent
Hy3
295.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
125.0Bparameters
295.0B
Hy3
125.0B
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Hy3 specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Hy3 specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Tencent
Hy3
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Sep 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy3 does not.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Hy3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Hy3 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next uses Qwen Community License 1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Hy3

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen Community License 1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Hy3 was released on 2026-07-06, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 2 months newer than Hy3.

Hy3

Jul 6, 2026

2 months ago

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Aug 26, 2026

3 weeks ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Hy3 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Hy3
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Hy3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Which is better, Hy3 or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads the LLM Stats Score 49.1 to 43.2. Hy3 is made by Tencent and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Hy3 compare to Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in benchmarks?

Hy3 scores DeepSearchQA: 91.0%, GPQA: 90.4%, IMO-AnswerBench: 90.0%, BrowseComp: 84.2%, MCP Atlas: 79.1%. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Hy3 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Hy3 supports 262K tokens and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Hy3 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.2 vs 49.1), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Qwen Community License 1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Hy3 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Hy3 is developed by Tencent and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.