Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Inkling-Small
Gemini 3.7 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Inkling-Small is 2.9x cheaper per token.
Google · Thinking Machines Lab · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Gemini 3.7 Flash outperforms in 4 benchmarks (Artificial Analysis, CharXiv-R, GDPval-AA, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Inkling-Small is better at 0 benchmarks. Gemini 3.7 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Inkling-Small is roughly 2.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 3.7 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
Choose Inkling-Small
- cost matters — it's about 2.9x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemini 3.7 Flash outperforms in 4 benchmarks (Artificial Analysis, CharXiv-R, GDPval-AA, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Inkling-Small is better at 0 benchmarks.
Gemini 3.7 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Playground indexes and blind preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3.7 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Inkling-Small ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3.7 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens) is 3.1x more expensive than Inkling-Small ($1.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 3.7 Flash is more expensive than Inkling-Small.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Inkling-Small's 256,000 tokens. Inkling-Small can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while Gemini 3.7 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Gemini 3.7 Flash and Inkling-Small support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Inkling-Small
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemini 3.7 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Inkling-Small uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3.7 Flash was released on 2026-08-13, while Inkling-Small was released on 2026-07-30.
Gemini 3.7 Flash is 0 month newer than Inkling-Small.
Aug 13, 2026
1 weeks ago
2w newerJul 30, 2026
3 weeks ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3.7 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Inkling-Small's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3.7 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Inkling-Small's cutoff date.
Mar 2026
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 3.7 Flash is available from Google. Inkling-Small is available from Thinking Machines Lab.
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Inkling-Small
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.7 Flash and Inkling-Small side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Inkling-Small.