The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-27B

Qwen3.8-27B leads the LLM Stats Score 45.2 to 38.9.

Thinking Machines Lab · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8-27B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.2 to 38.9, ranking #30 overall.

The models split the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

Qwen3.8-27B also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Inkling-Small

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output

Choose Qwen3.8-27B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.2 and ranks #30 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
38.9
#59
45.2
#30
38.5
#59
44.8
#31
29.3
#51
31.6
#39
22.9
#52
30.4
#31
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 6
3 of 6
Input price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
— / M
Context window
256,000
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
Inkling-Small
Qwen3.8-27B
34.0#50
31.0#68
19.5#69
33.1#18
21.6#49
22.7#42
17.7#73
36.9#6
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

24 reported for Inkling-Small · 26 for Qwen3.8-27B

6 shared

Inkling-Small outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, IFBench), while Qwen3.8-27B is better at 3 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.1).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

248.2B diff

Inkling-Small has 248.2B more parameters than Qwen3.8-27B, making it 893.5% larger.

Thinking Machines Lab
Inkling-Small
276.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
27.8Bparameters
276.0B
Inkling-Small
27.8B
Qwen3.8-27B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3.8-27B accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Inkling-Small's 256,000 tokens. Inkling-Small can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while Qwen3.8-27B is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Thinking Machines Lab
Inkling-Small
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
Input262,144 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Inkling-Small and Qwen3.8-27B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Inkling-Small

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Inkling-Small

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.8-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Inkling-Small was released on 2026-07-30, while Qwen3.8-27B was released on 2026-08-14.

Qwen3.8-27B is 1 month newer than Inkling-Small.

Inkling-Small

Jul 30, 2026

1 months ago

Qwen3.8-27B

Aug 14, 2026

3 weeks ago

2w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Inkling-Small is available from Thinking Machines Lab. Qwen3.8-27B is available from FriendliAI.

Inkling-Small

thinking-machines logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

Qwen3.8-27B

friendli logo
FriendliAI
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Inkling-Small and Qwen3.8-27B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Inkling-Small
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-27B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-27B.

Which is better, Inkling-Small or Qwen3.8-27B?

Qwen3.8-27B leads the LLM Stats Score 45.2 to 38.9. Inkling-Small is made by Thinking Machines Lab and Qwen3.8-27B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Inkling-Small compare to Qwen3.8-27B in benchmarks?

Inkling-Small scores AIME 2026: 95.5%, VoiceBench Avg: 90.1%, GPQA: 89.5%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 86.7%, ARC-AGI: 84.0%. Qwen3.8-27B scores MathVision: 94.6%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 90.3%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, GPQA: 89.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Inkling-Small and Qwen3.8-27B?

Inkling-Small supports 256K tokens and Qwen3.8-27B supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Inkling-Small and Qwen3.8-27B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (38.9 vs 45.2), context window (256K vs 262K). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Inkling-Small and Qwen3.8-27B?

Inkling-Small is developed by Thinking Machines Lab and Qwen3.8-27B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.