Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comparing Gemini 3.7 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Google · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Gemini 3.7 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.
On price, Llama 4 Maverick is roughly 5.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 3.7 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
Choose Llama 4 Maverick
- cost matters — it's about 5.4x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemini 3.7 Flash and Llama 4 Maverickdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Arena Performance
Playground indexes and blind preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3.7 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens) is 4.4x more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick ($0.17/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3.7 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens) is 6.3x more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick ($0.60/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 3.7 Flash is more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1,000,000 tokens. Llama 4 Maverick can generate longer responses up to 1,000,000 tokens, while Gemini 3.7 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Gemini 3.7 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemini 3.7 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 4 Maverick uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Llama 4 Community License Agreement
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3.7 Flash was released on 2026-08-13, while Llama 4 Maverick was released on 2025-04-05.
Gemini 3.7 Flash is 17 months newer than Llama 4 Maverick.
Aug 13, 2026
1 weeks ago
1.4yr newerApr 5, 2025
1.4 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3.7 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Llama 4 Maverick's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3.7 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Llama 4 Maverick's cutoff date.
Mar 2026
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 3.7 Flash is available from Google. Llama 4 Maverick is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Lambda, Groq, Fireworks, Together, Sambanova.
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.7 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick.