The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.8-27B

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Meta · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Llama 4 Maverick outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-27B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 4 Maverick

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.17/M input and $0.60/M output

Choose Qwen3.8-27B

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.17 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.60 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
Released
Apr 2025
Aug 2026
License
Llama 4 Community License Agreement
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Llama 4 Maverick outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-27B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

372.2B diff

Llama 4 Maverick has 372.2B more parameters than Qwen3.8-27B, making it 1339.8% larger.

Meta
Llama 4 Maverick
400.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
27.8Bparameters
400.0B
Llama 4 Maverick
27.8B
Qwen3.8-27B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 4 Maverick specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Llama 4 Maverick specifies output context (1,000,000 tokens).

Meta
Llama 4 Maverick
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3.8-27B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Llama 4 Maverick

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 4 Maverick is licensed under Llama 4 Community License Agreement, while Qwen3.8-27B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Qwen3.8-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 4 Maverick was released on 2025-04-05, while Qwen3.8-27B was released on 2026-08-14.

Qwen3.8-27B is 17 months newer than Llama 4 Maverick.

Llama 4 Maverick

Apr 5, 2025

1.4 years ago

Qwen3.8-27B

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.4yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3.8-27B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 4 Maverick
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-27B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.8-27B.

Which is better, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3.8-27B?

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Llama 4 Maverick is made by Meta and Qwen3.8-27B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Llama 4 Maverick compare to Qwen3.8-27B in benchmarks?

Llama 4 Maverick scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 92.3%, ChartQA: 90.0%, MMLU: 85.5%, MMLU-Pro: 80.5%. Qwen3.8-27B scores MathVision: 94.6%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 90.3%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, GPQA: 89.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3.8-27B?

Llama 4 Maverick supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.8-27B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3.8-27B?

Key differences include licensing (Llama 4 Community License Agreement vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3.8-27B?

Llama 4 Maverick is developed by Meta and Qwen3.8-27B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.