The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1

Gemini 3.7 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3.7 Flash is 1.3x cheaper per token.

Google · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.7 Flash outperforms in 3 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, DeepSWE 1.1, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Muse Spark 1.1 is better at 0 benchmarks. Gemini 3.7 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Gemini 3.7 Flash is roughly 1.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 1.3x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Muse Spark 1.1

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google
Muse Spark 1.1
Meta
Benchmark wins
3 of 3
0 of 3
Input price
$0.75 / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
$4.25 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,048,576
Released
Aug 2026
Jul 2026
License
Proprietary
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemini 3.7 Flash outperforms in 3 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, DeepSWE 1.1, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Muse Spark 1.1 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 3.7 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.7 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.7 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($4.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Spark 1.1 is more expensive than Gemini 3.7 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input tokens$0.75
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerGoogle
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 3.7 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3.7 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.7 Flash was released on 2026-08-13, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.

Gemini 3.7 Flash is 1 month newer than Muse Spark 1.1.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Aug 13, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer
Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.7 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Muse Spark 1.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.7 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark 1.1's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Mar 2026

Muse Spark 1.1

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.7 Flash is available from Google. Muse Spark 1.1 is available from Meta Model API.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M

Muse Spark 1.1

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.7 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1.

Which is better, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?

Gemini 3.7 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3.7 Flash is made by Google and Muse Spark 1.1 is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 3.7 Flash compare to Muse Spark 1.1 in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 97.0%, Harvey LAB-AA: 90.7%, CharXiv-R: 88.7%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.8%, LVBench: 85.4%. Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is 1.7x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75/M input and $3.75/M output via google. Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.7 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.7 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1?

Key differences include input pricing ($0.75 vs $1.25/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.7 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is developed by Google and Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons