The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LFM2.5-VL-3B vs Muse Spark 1.1

Comparing LFM2.5-VL-3B and Muse Spark 1.1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Liquid AI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LFM2.5-VL-3B and Muse Spark 1.1 trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LFM2.5-VL-3B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Spark 1.1

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
— / M
$4.25 / M
Context window
1,048,576
Released
Aug 2026
Jul 2026
License
LFM Open License v1.0
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

LFM2.5-VL-3B and Muse Spark 1.1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Spark 1.1 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Spark 1.1 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Liquid AI
LFM2.5-VL-3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both LFM2.5-VL-3B and Muse Spark 1.1 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LFM2.5-VL-3B is licensed under LFM Open License v1.0, while Muse Spark 1.1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LFM2.5-VL-3B was released on 2026-08-12, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.

LFM2.5-VL-3B is 1 month newer than Muse Spark 1.1.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Aug 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer
Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LFM2.5-VL-3B and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LFM2.5-VL-3B
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LFM2.5-VL-3B vs Muse Spark 1.1.

Which is better, LFM2.5-VL-3B or Muse Spark 1.1?

LFM2.5-VL-3B (Liquid AI) and Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does LFM2.5-VL-3B compare to Muse Spark 1.1 in benchmarks?

LFM2.5-VL-3B scores DocVQA: 91.1%, POPE: 88.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 87.9%, TextVQA: 84.3%, OCRBench: 84.2%. Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%.

What are the context window sizes for LFM2.5-VL-3B and Muse Spark 1.1?

LFM2.5-VL-3B supports an unknown number of tokens and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between LFM2.5-VL-3B and Muse Spark 1.1?

Key differences include licensing (LFM Open License v1.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LFM2.5-VL-3B and Muse Spark 1.1?

LFM2.5-VL-3B is developed by Liquid AI and Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta.