The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Max

Comparing Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.7 Max across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.7 Max trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, Gemini 3.7 Flash is roughly 1.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3.7 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash

  • cost matters — it's about 1.3x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Qwen3.7 Max

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.25/M input and $3.75/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.75 / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
$3.75 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,000,000
Released
Aug 2026
May 2026
License
Proprietary
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.7 Maxdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 3.7 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.7 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.7 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens) costs the same as Qwen3.7 Max ($3.75/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3.7 Max is more expensive than Gemini 3.7 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input tokens$0.75
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3.7 Max's 1,000,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3.7 Max does not.

Gemini 3.7 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.7 Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.7 Max

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.7 Flash was released on 2026-08-13, while Qwen3.7 Max was released on 2026-05-19.

Gemini 3.7 Flash is 3 months newer than Qwen3.7 Max.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Aug 13, 2026

1 weeks ago

2mo newer
Qwen3.7 Max

May 19, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.7 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Qwen3.7 Max's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.7 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.7 Max's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Mar 2026

Qwen3.7 Max

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.7 Flash is available from Google. Qwen3.7 Max is available from Novita, Together.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M

Qwen3.7 Max

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.7 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.7 Max
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Max.

Which is better, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.7 Max?

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google) and Qwen3.7 Max (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 3.7 Flash compare to Qwen3.7 Max in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 97.0%, Harvey LAB-AA: 90.7%, CharXiv-R: 88.7%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.8%, LVBench: 85.4%. Qwen3.7 Max scores HMMT Feb 26: 97.1%, Kernel Bench L3: 96.0%, MMLU-Redux: 95.0%, IFEval: 94.3%, GPQA: 92.4%.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is 1.7x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75/M input and $3.75/M output via google. Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.25/M input and $3.75/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.7 Max?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.7 Max supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.7 Max?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.75 vs $1.25/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.7 Max?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is developed by Google and Qwen3.7 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.