The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to -9.4.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to -9.4, ranking #15 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.0
#15
-9.4
#353
Reasoning
46.9
#24
-9.7
#345
Coding
39.3
#14
-4.3
#247
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.75 / M
— / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash · 28 for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.8 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash was released on 2026-09-02, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemini 3.8 Flash is 16 months newer than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview).

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Sep 2, 2026

3 days ago

1.3yr newer
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.8 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Gemini 3.8 Flash has more recent training data (up to 2026-03-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) (2024-06-01).

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Mar 2026

1.8 yr newer
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview).

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to -9.4. Gemini 3.8 Flash is made by Google and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash compare to Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.4%, LVBench: 87.1%, CharXiv-R: 86.2%, LABBench2: 86.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.0 vs -9.4), licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons