The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.7 to 8.4. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is 14.1x cheaper per token.

Google · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.7 to 8.4, ranking #25 overall.

On price, Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is roughly 14.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3.8 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.7 and ranks #25 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 14.1x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
48.7
#25
8.4
#294
Reasoning
45.6
#33
7.9
#295
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.75 / M
$0.07 / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
1,048,576
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Vision
33.3#20
10.1#132
Multimodal
34.3#16
13.1#112
Legal
7.6#146
9.3#137
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash · 15 for Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.8 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct ($0.07/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.8 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens) is 18.8x more expensive than Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.8 Flash is more expensive than Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Oct 10 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input tokens$0.75
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerGoogle
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 3.8 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat Oct 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash was released on 2026-09-02, while Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct was released on 2025-06-20.

Gemini 3.8 Flash is 15 months newer than Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Sep 2, 2026

1 months ago

1.2yr newer
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Jun 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.8 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct has a cutoff of 2023-10-01.

Gemini 3.8 Flash has more recent training data (up to 2026-03-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct (2023-10-01).

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Mar 2026

2.4 yr newer
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Oct 2023

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.8 Flash is available from Google. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is available from DeepInfra.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash
✓ Preferred
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.7 to 8.4. Gemini 3.8 Flash is made by Google and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash compare to Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.4%, LVBench: 87.1%, CharXiv-R: 86.2%, LABBench2: 86.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct scores DocVQA: 94.9%, AI2D: 92.9%, HumanEval Plus: 92.9%, ChartQA: 87.4%, IF: 84.8%.

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash cheaper than Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct?

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is 10.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.75/M input and $3.75/M output via google. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct costs $0.07/M input and $0.20/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct?

Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.7 vs 8.4), context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($0.75 vs $0.07/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is developed by Google and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons