Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Nova Pro
Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 12.5. Nova Pro is 1.1x cheaper per token.
Google · Amazon · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 12.5, ranking #11 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3.8 Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Nova Pro is roughly 1.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 3.8 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash
- overall performance matters — it scores 51.8 and ranks #11 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose Nova Pro
- cost matters — it's about 1.1x cheaper per token
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
13 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash · 27 for Nova Pro
Gemini 3.8 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (LVBench), while Nova Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.
Gemini 3.8 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3.8 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than Nova Pro ($0.80/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3.8 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens) is 1.2x more expensive than Nova Pro ($3.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 3.8 Flash is more expensive than Nova Pro.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Nova Pro's 300,000 tokens. Nova Pro can generate longer responses up to 300,000 tokens, while Gemini 3.8 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Gemini 3.8 Flash and Nova Pro support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Nova Pro
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3.8 Flash was released on 2026-09-02, while Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20.
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 22 months newer than Nova Pro.
Sep 2, 2026
0 days ago
1.8yr newerNov 20, 2024
1.8 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3.8 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Nova Pro's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3.8 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nova Pro's cutoff date.
Mar 2026
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 3.8 Flash is available from Google. Nova Pro is available from Bedrock.
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Nova Pro
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash and Nova Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Nova Pro.