The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 4 Argon vs Llama 4 Scout

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 7.8.

Google · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 7.8, ranking #4 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 4 Argon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.1 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Llama 4 Scout

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 4 Argon
Google
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
55.1
#4
7.8
#299
Reasoning
52.4
#7
6.6
#302
Coding
44.1
#4
0.3
#255
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.08 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
—
10,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemini 4 Argon
Llama 4 Scout
Vision
36.8#8
9.8#134
Multimodal
36.9#8
12.9#113
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Gemini 4 Argon · 12 for Llama 4 Scout

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 4 Argon and Llama 4 Scoutdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 4 Scout specifies input context (10,000,000 tokens). Only Llama 4 Scout specifies output context (10,000,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 4 Argon
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 4 Argon and Llama 4 Scout support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 4 Argon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 4 Argon is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 4 Scout uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 4 Argon

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 4 Argon was released on 2026-09-30, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.

Gemini 4 Argon is 18 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.

Gemini 4 Argon

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.5yr newer
Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Argon and Llama 4 Scout side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 4 Argon
✓ Preferred
Llama 4 Scout
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 4 Argon vs Llama 4 Scout.

Which is better, Gemini 4 Argon or Llama 4 Scout?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 7.8. Gemini 4 Argon is made by Google and Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 4 Argon compare to Llama 4 Scout in benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Argon scores Graphwalks BFS <128k: 99.7%, Vibe Code Bench: 91.9%, LVBench: 91.7%, LABBench2: 88.8%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 84.2%. Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 4 Argon and Llama 4 Scout?

Gemini 4 Argon supports an unknown number of tokens and Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 4 Argon and Llama 4 Scout?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.1 vs 7.8), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 4 Argon and Llama 4 Scout?

Gemini 4 Argon is developed by Google and Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons