The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 4 Argon vs MiniCPM-SALA

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.4 to 14.4.

Google · OpenBMB · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.4 to 14.4, ranking #4 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 4 Argon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.4 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose MiniCPM-SALA

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 4 Argon
Google
MiniCPM-SALA
OpenBMB
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
55.4
#4
14.4
#252
Reasoning
53.3
#6
15.7
#237
Coding
43.0
#7
20.9
#102
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 4 Argon
MiniCPM-SALA
Long context
30.6#3
19.5#34
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Gemini 4 Argon · 24 for MiniCPM-SALA

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 4 Argon and MiniCPM-SALAdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 4 Argon supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniCPM-SALA does not.

Gemini 4 Argon can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 4 Argon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniCPM-SALA

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 4 Argon is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiniCPM-SALA uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 4 Argon

Proprietary

Closed source

MiniCPM-SALA

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 4 Argon was released on 2026-09-30, while MiniCPM-SALA was released on 2026-02-11.

Gemini 4 Argon is 8 months newer than MiniCPM-SALA.

Gemini 4 Argon

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

7mo newer
MiniCPM-SALA

Feb 11, 2026

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Argon and MiniCPM-SALA side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 4 Argon
✓ Preferred
MiniCPM-SALA
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 4 Argon vs MiniCPM-SALA.

Which is better, Gemini 4 Argon or MiniCPM-SALA?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.4 to 14.4. Gemini 4 Argon is made by Google and MiniCPM-SALA is made by OpenBMB. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 4 Argon compare to MiniCPM-SALA in benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Argon scores Graphwalks BFS <128k: 99.7%, Vibe Code Bench: 91.9%, LVBench: 91.7%, LABBench2: 88.8%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 84.2%. MiniCPM-SALA scores HumanEval: 95.1%, RULER 64k: 92.7%, RULER 128k: 89.4%, MBPP: 89.1%, RULER 512K: 87.1%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 4 Argon and MiniCPM-SALA?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.4 vs 14.4), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 4 Argon and MiniCPM-SALA?

Gemini 4 Argon is developed by Google and MiniCPM-SALA is developed by OpenBMB.

Related comparisons