The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 4 Argon vs Phi 4 Reasoning

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 12.0.

Google · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 12.0, ranking #4 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 4 Argon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.1 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 4 Argon
Google
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
55.1
#4
12.0
#270
Reasoning
52.4
#7
12.6
#259
Coding
44.1
#4
6.3
#204
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Gemini 4 Argon · 11 for Phi 4 Reasoning

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 4 Argon and Phi 4 Reasoningdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 4 Argon supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning does not.

Gemini 4 Argon can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 4 Argon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Reasoning

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 4 Argon is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 Reasoning uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 4 Argon

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi 4 Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 4 Argon was released on 2026-09-30, while Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.

Gemini 4 Argon is 17 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning.

Gemini 4 Argon

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.4yr newer
Phi 4 Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while Gemini 4 Argon's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 4 Argon's cutoff date.

Gemini 4 Argon

—

Phi 4 Reasoning

Mar 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Argon and Phi 4 Reasoning side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 4 Argon
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Reasoning
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 4 Argon vs Phi 4 Reasoning.

Which is better, Gemini 4 Argon or Phi 4 Reasoning?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 12.0. Gemini 4 Argon is made by Google and Phi 4 Reasoning is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 4 Argon compare to Phi 4 Reasoning in benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Argon scores Graphwalks BFS <128k: 99.7%, Vibe Code Bench: 91.9%, LVBench: 91.7%, LABBench2: 88.8%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 84.2%. Phi 4 Reasoning scores FlenQA: 97.7%, HumanEval+: 92.9%, IFEval: 83.4%, OmniMath: 76.6%, AIME 2024: 75.3%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 4 Argon and Phi 4 Reasoning?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.1 vs 12.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 4 Argon and Phi 4 Reasoning?

Gemini 4 Argon is developed by Google and Phi 4 Reasoning is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons