The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 5.2.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 5.2, ranking #4 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 4 Argon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.1 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 4 Argon
Google
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
55.1
#4
5.2
#315
Reasoning
52.4
#7
1.4
#328
Coding
44.1
#4
1.1
#249
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemini 4 Argon
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Vision
36.8#8
5.1#163
Multimodal
36.9#8
6.5#142
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Gemini 4 Argon · 45 for Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen2.5-Omni-7Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 4 Argon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 4 Argon is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 4 Argon

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 4 Argon was released on 2026-09-30, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

Gemini 4 Argon is 18 months newer than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Gemini 4 Argon

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.5yr newer
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 4 Argon
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Which is better, Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 5.2. Gemini 4 Argon is made by Google and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 4 Argon compare to Qwen2.5-Omni-7B in benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Argon scores Graphwalks BFS <128k: 99.7%, Vibe Code Bench: 91.9%, LVBench: 91.7%, LABBench2: 88.8%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 84.2%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores FLEURS: 95.9%, DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.1 vs 5.2), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Gemini 4 Argon is developed by Google and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons