The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 4 Argon vs QwQ-32B-Preview

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 9.0.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 9.0, ranking #4 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 4 Argon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.1 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose QwQ-32B-Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 4 Argon
Google
QwQ-32B-Preview
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
55.1
#4
9.0
#288
Reasoning
52.4
#7
9.3
#278
Coding
44.1
#4
4.4
#221
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
—
32,768

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Gemini 4 Argon · 4 for QwQ-32B-Preview

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 4 Argon and QwQ-32B-Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only QwQ-32B-Preview specifies input context (32,768 tokens). Only QwQ-32B-Preview specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Google
Gemini 4 Argon
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 4 Argon supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B-Preview does not.

Gemini 4 Argon can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 4 Argon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QwQ-32B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 4 Argon is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B-Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 4 Argon

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B-Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 4 Argon was released on 2026-09-30, while QwQ-32B-Preview was released on 2024-11-28.

Gemini 4 Argon is 22 months newer than QwQ-32B-Preview.

Gemini 4 Argon

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.8yr newer
QwQ-32B-Preview

Nov 28, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B-Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Gemini 4 Argon's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B-Preview's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 4 Argon's cutoff date.

Gemini 4 Argon

—

QwQ-32B-Preview

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Argon and QwQ-32B-Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 4 Argon
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B-Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 4 Argon vs QwQ-32B-Preview.

Which is better, Gemini 4 Argon or QwQ-32B-Preview?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 9.0. Gemini 4 Argon is made by Google and QwQ-32B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 4 Argon compare to QwQ-32B-Preview in benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Argon scores Graphwalks BFS <128k: 99.7%, Vibe Code Bench: 91.9%, LVBench: 91.7%, LABBench2: 88.8%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 84.2%. QwQ-32B-Preview scores MATH-500: 90.6%, GPQA: 65.2%, AIME 2024: 50.0%, LiveCodeBench: 50.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 4 Argon and QwQ-32B-Preview?

Gemini 4 Argon supports an unknown number of tokens and QwQ-32B-Preview supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 4 Argon and QwQ-32B-Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.1 vs 9.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 4 Argon and QwQ-32B-Preview?

Gemini 4 Argon is developed by Google and QwQ-32B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons