The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Gemma 2 9B

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the LLM Stats Score 59.0 to -5.3.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.0 to -5.3, ranking #2 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 4 Carbon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.0 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Gemma 2 9B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 4 Carbon
Google
Gemma 2 9B
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
59.0
#2
-5.3
#391
Reasoning
54.9
#5
-5.6
#384
Coding
48.1
#3
-11.1
#299
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Gemini 4 Carbon · 16 for Gemma 2 9B

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 4 Carbon and Gemma 2 9Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 4 Carbon supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 9B does not.

Gemini 4 Carbon can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 4 Carbon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 2 9B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 4 Carbon is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 2 9B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 4 Carbon

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 2 9B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 4 Carbon was released on 2026-10-28, while Gemma 2 9B was released on 2024-06-27.

Gemini 4 Carbon is 28 months newer than Gemma 2 9B.

Gemini 4 Carbon

Oct 28, 2026

-1 days ago

2.3yr newer
Gemma 2 9B

Jun 27, 2024

2.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Carbon and Gemma 2 9B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 4 Carbon
✓ Preferred
Gemma 2 9B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 4 Carbon vs Gemma 2 9B.

Which is better, Gemini 4 Carbon or Gemma 2 9B?

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the LLM Stats Score 59.0 to -5.3. Gemini 4 Carbon is made by Google and Gemma 2 9B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 4 Carbon compare to Gemma 2 9B in benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Carbon scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 100.0%, Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 96.2%, WebDev Arena: 88.4%, SEC-bench Pro: 88.2%. Gemma 2 9B scores ARC-E: 88.0%, BoolQ: 84.2%, HellaSwag: 81.9%, PIQA: 81.7%, Winogrande: 80.6%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 4 Carbon and Gemma 2 9B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (59.0 vs -5.3), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons