The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-4.1 nano

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the LLM Stats Score 59.0 to 1.1.

Google · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.0 to 1.1, ranking #2 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 4 Carbon wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 4 Carbon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.0 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose GPT-4.1 nano

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 4 Carbon
Google
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
59.0
#2
1.1
#356
Reasoning
54.9
#5
1.4
#344
Coding
48.1
#3
-12.1
#300
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.40 / M
Context window
—
1,047,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemini 4 Carbon
GPT-4.1 nano
Vision
36.0#12
-2.0#217
Tool use
35.8#3
-10.7#228
Multimodal
38.0#6
0.6#173
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Gemini 4 Carbon · 24 for GPT-4.1 nano

1 shared

Gemini 4 Carbon outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Graphwalks BFS >128k), while GPT-4.1 nano is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Carbon significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Nov 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4.1 nano specifies input context (1,047,576 tokens). Only GPT-4.1 nano specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Google
Gemini 4 Carbon
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 nano
Input1,047,576 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Sun Nov 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-4.1 nano support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 4 Carbon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4.1 nano

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 4 Carbon

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-4.1 nano

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 4 Carbon was released on 2026-10-28, while GPT-4.1 nano was released on 2025-04-14.

Gemini 4 Carbon is 19 months newer than GPT-4.1 nano.

Gemini 4 Carbon

Oct 28, 2026

3 days ago

1.5yr newer
GPT-4.1 nano

Apr 14, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4.1 nano has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Gemini 4 Carbon's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4.1 nano's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 4 Carbon's cutoff date.

Gemini 4 Carbon

—

GPT-4.1 nano

May 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-4.1 nano side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 4 Carbon
✓ Preferred
GPT-4.1 nano
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-4.1 nano.

Which is better, Gemini 4 Carbon or GPT-4.1 nano?

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the LLM Stats Score 59.0 to 1.1. Gemini 4 Carbon is made by Google and GPT-4.1 nano is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 4 Carbon compare to GPT-4.1 nano in benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Carbon scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 100.0%, Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 96.2%, WebDev Arena: 88.4%, SEC-bench Pro: 88.2%. GPT-4.1 nano scores MMLU: 80.1%, IFEval: 74.5%, CharXiv-D: 73.9%, MMMLU: 66.9%, Multi-IF: 57.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-4.1 nano?

Gemini 4 Carbon supports an unknown number of tokens and GPT-4.1 nano supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-4.1 nano?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (59.0 vs 1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-4.1 nano?

Gemini 4 Carbon is developed by Google and GPT-4.1 nano is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons