The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 4 Carbon vs LFM3-VL-2B

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the LLM Stats Score 58.8 to 15.5.

Google · Liquid AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 58.8 to 15.5, ranking #2 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 4 Carbon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 58.8 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose LFM3-VL-2B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 4 Carbon
Google
LFM3-VL-2B
Liquid AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
58.8
#2
15.5
#265
Reasoning
54.4
#5
16.2
#252
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemini 4 Carbon
LFM3-VL-2B
Vision
36.0#13
11.4#133
Multimodal
38.0#6
12.6#124
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Gemini 4 Carbon · 41 for LFM3-VL-2B

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 4 Carbon and LFM3-VL-2Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 4 Carbon and LFM3-VL-2B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 4 Carbon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

LFM3-VL-2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 4 Carbon is licensed under a proprietary license, while LFM3-VL-2B uses LFM Open License v1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 4 Carbon

Proprietary

Closed source

LFM3-VL-2B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 4 Carbon was released on 2026-10-28, while LFM3-VL-2B was released on 2026-10-27.

Gemini 4 Carbon is 0 month newer than LFM3-VL-2B.

Gemini 4 Carbon

Oct 28, 2026

5 days ago

1d newer
LFM3-VL-2B

Oct 27, 2026

6 days ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Carbon and LFM3-VL-2B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 4 Carbon
✓ Preferred
LFM3-VL-2B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 4 Carbon vs LFM3-VL-2B.

Which is better, Gemini 4 Carbon or LFM3-VL-2B?

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the LLM Stats Score 58.8 to 15.5. Gemini 4 Carbon is made by Google and LFM3-VL-2B is made by Liquid AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 4 Carbon compare to LFM3-VL-2B in benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Carbon scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 100.0%, Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 96.2%, WebDev Arena: 88.4%, SEC-bench Pro: 88.2%. LFM3-VL-2B scores DocVQA: 96.7%, CountBench: 93.0%, ChartQA: 92.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 90.5%, POPE: 88.7%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 4 Carbon and LFM3-VL-2B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (58.8 vs 15.5), licensing (Proprietary vs LFM Open License v1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 4 Carbon and LFM3-VL-2B?

Gemini 4 Carbon is developed by Google and LFM3-VL-2B is developed by Liquid AI.

Related comparisons