The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Sarvam-105B

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the LLM Stats Score 59.0 to 24.9.

Google · Sarvam AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.0 to 24.9, ranking #2 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 4 Carbon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.0 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Sarvam-105B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 4 Carbon
Google
Sarvam-105B
Sarvam AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
59.0
#2
24.9
#191
Reasoning
54.9
#5
25.4
#182
Coding
48.1
#3
-2.2
#282
Agents
46.0
#2
4.4
#186
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Gemini 4 Carbon · 14 for Sarvam-105B

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 4 Carbon and Sarvam-105Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 4 Carbon supports multimodal inputs, whereas Sarvam-105B does not.

Gemini 4 Carbon can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 4 Carbon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Sarvam-105B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 4 Carbon is licensed under a proprietary license, while Sarvam-105B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 4 Carbon

Proprietary

Closed source

Sarvam-105B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 4 Carbon was released on 2026-10-28, while Sarvam-105B was released on 2026-03-06.

Gemini 4 Carbon is 8 months newer than Sarvam-105B.

Gemini 4 Carbon

Oct 28, 2026

3 days ago

7mo newer
Sarvam-105B

Mar 6, 2026

7 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Carbon and Sarvam-105B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 4 Carbon
✓ Preferred
Sarvam-105B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 4 Carbon vs Sarvam-105B.

Which is better, Gemini 4 Carbon or Sarvam-105B?

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the LLM Stats Score 59.0 to 24.9. Gemini 4 Carbon is made by Google and Sarvam-105B is made by Sarvam AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 4 Carbon compare to Sarvam-105B in benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Carbon scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 100.0%, Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 96.2%, WebDev Arena: 88.4%, SEC-bench Pro: 88.2%. Sarvam-105B scores MATH-500: 98.6%, AIME 2025: 96.7%, MMLU: 90.6%, HMMT 2025: 85.8%, HMMT25: 85.8%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 4 Carbon and Sarvam-105B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (59.0 vs 24.9), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 4 Carbon and Sarvam-105B?

Gemini 4 Carbon is developed by Google and Sarvam-105B is developed by Sarvam AI.

Related comparisons