Model Comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs Gemini 2.0 Flash

Gemini 2.0 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Gemma 2 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 2.0 Flash is better at 1 benchmark (MATH).

Gemini 2.0 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jun 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 2.0 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 2.0 Flash specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Gemma 2 27B

Input- tokens

Output- tokens

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Input1,048,576 tokens

Output8,192 tokens

Tue Jun 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.0 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 27B does not.

Gemini 2.0 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 2 27B

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 27B is licensed under Gemma, while Gemini 2.0 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while Gemini 2.0 Flash was released on 2024-12-01.

Gemini 2.0 Flash is 5 months newer than Gemma 2 27B.

Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

1.9 years ago

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Dec 1, 2024

1.5 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Gemma 2 27B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemma 2 27B's cutoff date.

Gemma 2 27B

—

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Aug 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.0 Flash

View details

Google

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Higher MATH score (89.7% vs 42.3%)

Gemma 2 27B

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Gemma 2 27B	Gemini 2.0 Flash

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 27B vs Gemini 2.0 Flash.

Which is better, Gemma 2 27B or Gemini 2.0 Flash?

Gemini 2.0 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 2 27B is made by Google and Gemini 2.0 Flash is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 2 27B compare to Gemini 2.0 Flash in benchmarks?

Gemma 2 27B scores ARC-E: 88.6%, HellaSwag: 86.4%, BoolQ: 84.8%, TriviaQA: 83.7%, Winogrande: 83.7%. Gemini 2.0 Flash scores Natural2Code: 92.9%, MATH: 89.7%, FACTS Grounding: 83.6%, MMLU-Pro: 76.4%, EgoSchema: 71.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 2 27B and Gemini 2.0 Flash?

Gemma 2 27B supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemini 2.0 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 2 27B and Gemini 2.0 Flash?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.