Model Comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs Gemini 2.0 Flash

Gemini 2.0 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Gemma 2 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 2.0 Flash is better at 1 benchmark (MATH).

Gemini 2.0 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 2 27B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 2.0 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 2.0 Flash specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemma 2 27B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.0 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 27B does not.

Gemini 2.0 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 2 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 27B is licensed under Gemma, while Gemini 2.0 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while Gemini 2.0 Flash was released on 2024-12-01.

Gemini 2.0 Flash is 5 months newer than Gemma 2 27B.

Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

1.8 years ago

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Dec 1, 2024

1.3 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Gemma 2 27B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemma 2 27B's cutoff date.

Gemma 2 27B

—

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Aug 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Has open weights
Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher MATH score (89.7% vs 42.3%)
GoogleGemma 2 27B
GoogleGemini 2.0 Flash
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 2 27B
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 27B vs Gemini 2.0 Flash

Gemini 2.0 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 2 27B is made by Google and Gemini 2.0 Flash is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemma 2 27B scores ARC-E: 88.6%, HellaSwag: 86.4%, BoolQ: 84.8%, TriviaQA: 83.7%, Winogrande: 83.7%. Gemini 2.0 Flash scores Natural2Code: 92.9%, MATH: 89.7%, FACTS Grounding: 83.6%, MMLU-Pro: 76.4%, EgoSchema: 71.5%.
Gemma 2 27B supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemini 2.0 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.