Model Comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Comparing Gemma 2 27B and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 2 27B and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 2 27B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 27B does not.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 2 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 27B is licensed under Gemma, while Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was released on 2025-01-21.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is 7 months newer than Gemma 2 27B.

Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

1.8 years ago

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Jan 21, 2025

1.2 years ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Gemma 2 27B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemma 2 27B's cutoff date.

Gemma 2 27B

—

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Aug 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Has open weights
Google
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 2 27B
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 27B vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Gemma 2 27B (Google) and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
Gemma 2 27B scores ARC-E: 88.6%, HellaSwag: 86.4%, BoolQ: 84.8%, TriviaQA: 83.7%, Winogrande: 83.7%. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking scores MMMU: 75.4%, GPQA: 74.2%, AIME 2024: 73.3%.
Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.