Model Comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-4

GPT-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Gemma 2 27B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MATH), while GPT-4 is better at 4 benchmarks (HellaSwag, HumanEval, MMLU, Winogrande).

GPT-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Apr 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Apr 05 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 2 27B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
OpenAI
GPT-4
Input tokens$30.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4 specifies input context (32,768 tokens). Only GPT-4 specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Google
Gemma 2 27B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Sun Apr 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 27B does not.

GPT-4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 2 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 27B is licensed under Gemma, while GPT-4 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma

Open weights

GPT-4

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while GPT-4 was released on 2023-06-13.

Gemma 2 27B is 13 months newer than GPT-4.

Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

1.8 years ago

1.0yr newer
GPT-4

Jun 13, 2023

2.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2022-12-31, while Gemma 2 27B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4's training data extends to 2022-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemma 2 27B's cutoff date.

Gemma 2 27B

—

GPT-4

Dec 2022

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Has open weights
Higher MATH score (42.3% vs 42.0%)
OpenAI
Larger context window (32,768 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher HellaSwag score (95.3% vs 86.4%)
Higher HumanEval score (67.0% vs 51.8%)
Higher MMLU score (86.4% vs 75.2%)
Higher Winogrande score (87.5% vs 83.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 2 27B
OpenAI
GPT-4

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-4

GPT-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 2 27B is made by Google and GPT-4 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemma 2 27B scores ARC-E: 88.6%, HellaSwag: 86.4%, BoolQ: 84.8%, TriviaQA: 83.7%, Winogrande: 83.7%. GPT-4 scores AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC): 96.3%, HellaSwag: 95.3%, Uniform Bar Exam: 90.0%, SAT Math: 89.0%, LSAT: 88.0%.
Gemma 2 27B supports an unknown number of tokens and GPT-4 supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemma 2 27B is developed by Google and GPT-4 is developed by OpenAI.