Model Comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-4oWhich is better in 2026?

GPT-4o significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-4o — which is better?

Gemma 2 27B (by Google) and GPT-4o (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 2 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT-4o is better at 3 benchmarks (HumanEval, MATH, MMLU). GPT-4o significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 2 27B if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose GPT-4o if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemma 2 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT-4o is better at 3 benchmarks (HumanEval, MATH, MMLU).

GPT-4o significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4o specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only GPT-4o specifies output context (4,096 tokens).

Google
Gemma 2 27B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input128,000 tokens
Output4,096 tokens
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 27B does not.

GPT-4o can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 2 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4o

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 27B is licensed under Gemma, while GPT-4o uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma

Open weights

GPT-4o

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while GPT-4o was released on 2024-05-13.

Gemma 2 27B is 2 months newer than GPT-4o.

Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

1.9 years ago

1mo newer
GPT-4o

May 13, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Has open weights
OpenAI
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher HumanEval score (90.2% vs 51.8%)
Higher MATH score (76.6% vs 42.3%)
Higher MMLU score (88.7% vs 75.2%)
GoogleGemma 2 27B
OpenAIGPT-4o
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 2 27B
OpenAI
GPT-4o

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-4o.

Which is better, Gemma 2 27B or GPT-4o?

GPT-4o significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 2 27B is made by Google and GPT-4o is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 2 27B compare to GPT-4o in benchmarks?

Gemma 2 27B scores ARC-E: 88.6%, HellaSwag: 86.4%, BoolQ: 84.8%, TriviaQA: 83.7%, Winogrande: 83.7%. GPT-4o scores MGSM: 90.5%, HumanEval: 90.2%, MMLU: 88.7%, DROP: 83.4%, MATH: 76.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 2 27B and GPT-4o?

Gemma 2 27B supports an unknown number of tokens and GPT-4o supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 2 27B and GPT-4o?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 2 27B and GPT-4o?

Gemma 2 27B is developed by Google and GPT-4o is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons