The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 2 27B vs Kimi-k1.5

Kimi-k1.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 17.5 to -0.2.

Google · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi-k1.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 17.5 to -0.2, ranking #196 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Kimi-k1.5 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 2 27B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Kimi-k1.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 17.5 and ranks #196 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-0.2
#308
17.5
#196
-0.6
#305
16.8
#195
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 2 27B
Kimi-k1.5
-0.2#282
20.6#144
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Gemma 2 27B · 9 for Kimi-k1.5

1 shared

Gemma 2 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Kimi-k1.5 is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU).

Kimi-k1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Aug 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Kimi-k1.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 27B does not.

Kimi-k1.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 2 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi-k1.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 27B is licensed under Gemma, while Kimi-k1.5 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Kimi-k1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while Kimi-k1.5 was released on 2025-01-20.

Kimi-k1.5 is 7 months newer than Gemma 2 27B.

Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

2.2 years ago

Kimi-k1.5

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 2 27B and Kimi-k1.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 2 27B
✓ Preferred
Kimi-k1.5
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 27B vs Kimi-k1.5.

Which is better, Gemma 2 27B or Kimi-k1.5?

Kimi-k1.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 17.5 to -0.2. Gemma 2 27B is made by Google and Kimi-k1.5 is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 2 27B compare to Kimi-k1.5 in benchmarks?

Gemma 2 27B scores ARC-E: 88.6%, HellaSwag: 86.4%, BoolQ: 84.8%, TriviaQA: 83.7%, Winogrande: 83.7%. Kimi-k1.5 scores MATH-500: 96.2%, CLUEWSC: 91.4%, C-Eval: 88.3%, MMLU: 87.4%, IFEval: 87.2%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 2 27B and Kimi-k1.5?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.2 vs 17.5), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 2 27B and Kimi-k1.5?

Gemma 2 27B is developed by Google and Kimi-k1.5 is developed by Moonshot AI.