Model Comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs Kimi K3Which is better in 2026?

Comparing Gemma 2 27B and Kimi K3 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Gemma 2 27B vs Kimi K3 — which is better?

Gemma 2 27B (by Google) and Kimi K3 (by Moonshot AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose Gemma 2 27B if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Kimi K3 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 2 27B and Kimi K3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2772.8B diff

Kimi K3 has 2772.8B more parameters than Gemma 2 27B, making it 10194.1% larger.

Google
Gemma 2 27B
27.2Bparameters
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
2.8Tparameters
27.2B
Gemma 2 27B
2800.0B
Kimi K3

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Kimi K3 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Kimi K3 specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Google
Gemma 2 27B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Kimi K3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 27B does not.

Kimi K3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 2 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi K3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while Kimi K3 was released on 2026-07-16.

Kimi K3 is 25 months newer than Gemma 2 27B.

Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

2.1 years ago

Kimi K3

Jul 16, 2026

2 days ago

2.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Moonshot AI
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 2 27B and Kimi K3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 2 27B
✓ Preferred
Kimi K3
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 2 27B
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 27B vs Kimi K3.

Which is better, Gemma 2 27B or Kimi K3?

Gemma 2 27B (Google) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemma 2 27B compare to Kimi K3 in benchmarks?

Gemma 2 27B scores ARC-E: 88.6%, HellaSwag: 86.4%, BoolQ: 84.8%, TriviaQA: 83.7%, Winogrande: 83.7%. Kimi K3 scores MathVision: 97.8%, DeepSearchQA: 95.0%, GPQA: 93.5%, CharXiv-R: 91.3%, BrowseComp: 91.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 2 27B and Kimi K3?

Gemma 2 27B supports an unknown number of tokens and Kimi K3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 2 27B and Kimi K3?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Gemma vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 2 27B and Kimi K3?

Gemma 2 27B is developed by Google and Kimi K3 is developed by Moonshot AI.

Related comparisons