Gemma 2 27B vs Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Comparison
Comparing Gemma 2 27B and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemma 2 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is better at 5 benchmarks (ARC-C, GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU).
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has 377.8B more parameters than Gemma 2 27B, making it 1389.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Llama 3.1 405B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Llama 3.1 405B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemma 2 27B is licensed under Gemma, while Llama 3.1 405B Instruct uses Llama 3.1 Community License.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Gemma
Open weights
Llama 3.1 Community License
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while Llama 3.1 405B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is 1 month newer than Gemma 2 27B.
Jun 27, 2024
1.7 years ago
Jul 23, 2024
1.6 years ago
3w newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Gemma 2 27B
View detailsDetailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|