Gemma 2 27B vs Nova Micro Comparison

Comparing Gemma 2 27B and Nova Micro across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Gemma 2 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nova Micro is better at 5 benchmarks (ARC-C, GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU).

Nova Micro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Mar 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 2 27B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Amazon
Nova Micro
Input tokens$0.03
Output tokens$0.14
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nova Micro specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Nova Micro specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 2 27B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Amazon
Nova Micro
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat Mar 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 27B is licensed under Gemma, while Nova Micro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Nova Micro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while Nova Micro was released on 2024-11-20.

Nova Micro is 5 months newer than Gemma 2 27B.

Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

1.7 years ago

Nova Micro

Nov 20, 2024

1.3 years ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Has open weights
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Higher ARC-C score (90.2% vs 71.4%)
Higher GSM8k score (92.3% vs 74.0%)
Higher HumanEval score (81.1% vs 51.8%)
Higher MATH score (69.3% vs 42.3%)
Higher MMLU score (77.6% vs 75.2%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 2 27B
Amazon
Nova Micro