The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 2 27B vs o1

o1 leads the LLM Stats Score 21.2 to -0.5.

Google · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

o1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 21.2 to -0.5, ranking #181 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, o1 wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 2 27B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose o1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 21.2 and ranks #181 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-0.5
#317
21.2
#181
-0.9
#313
21.5
#170
-7.9
#253
4.8
#196
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 4
4 of 4
Input price
— / M
$15.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$60.00 / M
Context window
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 2 27B
o1
-0.3#288
24.1#113
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Gemma 2 27B · 19 for o1

4 shared

Gemma 2 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o1 is better at 4 benchmarks (GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU).

o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o1 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o1 specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 2 27B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o1
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 27B is licensed under Gemma, while o1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma

Open weights

o1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while o1 was released on 2024-12-17.

o1 is 6 months newer than Gemma 2 27B.

Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

2.2 years ago

o1

Dec 17, 2024

1.7 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 2 27B and o1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 2 27B
✓ Preferred
o1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 27B vs o1.

Which is better, Gemma 2 27B or o1?

o1 leads the LLM Stats Score 21.2 to -0.5. Gemma 2 27B is made by Google and o1 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 2 27B compare to o1 in benchmarks?

Gemma 2 27B scores ARC-E: 88.6%, HellaSwag: 86.4%, BoolQ: 84.8%, TriviaQA: 83.7%, Winogrande: 83.7%. o1 scores GSM8k: 97.1%, MATH: 96.4%, GPQA Physics: 92.8%, MMLU: 91.8%, MGSM: 89.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 2 27B and o1?

Gemma 2 27B supports an unknown number of tokens and o1 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 2 27B and o1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.5 vs 21.2), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 2 27B and o1?

Gemma 2 27B is developed by Google and o1 is developed by OpenAI.