Gemma 2 27B vs Phi 4 Comparison
Comparing Gemma 2 27B and Phi 4 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemma 2 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Phi 4 is better at 3 benchmarks (HumanEval, MATH, MMLU).
Phi 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Gemma 2 27B has 12.5B more parameters than Phi 4, making it 85.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Phi 4 specifies input context (16,000 tokens). Only Phi 4 specifies output context (16,000 tokens).
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemma 2 27B is licensed under Gemma, while Phi 4 uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Gemma
Open weights
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while Phi 4 was released on 2024-12-12.
Phi 4 is 6 months newer than Gemma 2 27B.
Jun 27, 2024
1.7 years ago
Dec 12, 2024
1.3 years ago
5mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Phi 4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Gemma 2 27B's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Phi 4's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemma 2 27B's cutoff date.
—
Jun 2024
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Gemma 2 27B
View detailsPhi 4
View detailsMicrosoft
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|