Model Comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs QvQ-72B-Preview

Comparing Gemma 2 27B and QvQ-72B-Preview across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 2 27B and QvQ-72B-Preview don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Apr 06 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 2 27B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

46.2B diff

QvQ-72B-Preview has 46.2B more parameters than Gemma 2 27B, making it 169.9% larger.

Google
Gemma 2 27B
27.2Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
73.4Bparameters
27.2B
Gemma 2 27B
73.4B
QvQ-72B-Preview

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

QvQ-72B-Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 27B does not.

QvQ-72B-Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 2 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QvQ-72B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 27B is licensed under Gemma, while QvQ-72B-Preview uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma

Open weights

QvQ-72B-Preview

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while QvQ-72B-Preview was released on 2024-12-25.

QvQ-72B-Preview is 6 months newer than Gemma 2 27B.

Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

1.8 years ago

QvQ-72B-Preview

Dec 25, 2024

1.3 years ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

QvQ-72B-Preview

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 2 27B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 27B vs QvQ-72B-Preview

Gemma 2 27B (Google) and QvQ-72B-Preview (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
Gemma 2 27B scores ARC-E: 88.6%, HellaSwag: 86.4%, BoolQ: 84.8%, TriviaQA: 83.7%, Winogrande: 83.7%. QvQ-72B-Preview scores MathVista: 71.4%, MMMU: 70.3%, MathVision: 35.9%, OlympiadBench: 20.4%.
Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Gemma vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemma 2 27B is developed by Google and QvQ-72B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.