The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 2 9B

Gemma 2 27B and Gemma 2 9B are closely matched at -0.7 and -4.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 2 27B and Gemma 2 9B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at -0.7 and -4.9.

In the 16 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemma 2 27B wins 16; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 2 27B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 16 of 16 exact shared results

Choose Gemma 2 9B

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-0.7
#330
-4.9
#354
-1.1
#326
-5.2
#347
-7.9
#263
-11.0
#265
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
16 of 16
0 of 16
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemma 2 27B
Gemma 2 9B
-0.7#297
-3.8#314
1.9#173
-0.1#184
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Gemma 2 27B · 16 for Gemma 2 9B

16 shared

Gemma 2 27B outperforms in 16 benchmarks (AGIEval, ARC-C, ARC-E, BIG-Bench, BoolQ, GSM8k, HellaSwag, HumanEval, MATH, MBPP, MMLU, Natural Questions, PIQA, Social IQa, TriviaQA, Winogrande), while Gemma 2 9B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemma 2 27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

18.0B diff

Gemma 2 27B has 18.0B more parameters than Gemma 2 9B, making it 194.4% larger.

Google
Gemma 2 27B
27.2Bparameters
Google
Gemma 2 9B
9.2Bparameters
27.2B
Gemma 2 27B
9.2B
Gemma 2 9B

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Gemma.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Gemma 2 9B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2024-06-27.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

2.2 years ago

Gemma 2 9B

Jun 27, 2024

2.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 2 27B and Gemma 2 9B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 2 27B
✓ Preferred
Gemma 2 9B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 2 9B.

Which is better, Gemma 2 27B or Gemma 2 9B?

Gemma 2 27B and Gemma 2 9B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at -0.7 and -4.9. Gemma 2 27B is made by Google and Gemma 2 9B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 2 27B compare to Gemma 2 9B in benchmarks?

Gemma 2 27B scores ARC-E: 88.6%, HellaSwag: 86.4%, BoolQ: 84.8%, TriviaQA: 83.7%, Winogrande: 83.7%. Gemma 2 9B scores ARC-E: 88.0%, BoolQ: 84.2%, HellaSwag: 81.9%, PIQA: 81.7%, Winogrande: 80.6%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 2 27B and Gemma 2 9B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.7 vs -4.9). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.