The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 2 9B vs GPT-4

GPT-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Google · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 2 9B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT-4 is better at 5 benchmarks (HellaSwag, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU, Winogrande). GPT-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 2 9B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose GPT-4

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 5 of 5 shared benchmarks

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 5
5 of 5
Input price
— / M
$30.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$60.00 / M
Context window
32,768
Released
Jun 2024
Jun 2023
License
Gemma
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Gemma 2 9B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT-4 is better at 5 benchmarks (HellaSwag, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU, Winogrande).

GPT-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4 specifies input context (32,768 tokens). Only GPT-4 specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Google
Gemma 2 9B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 9B does not.

GPT-4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 2 9B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 9B is licensed under Gemma, while GPT-4 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 9B

Gemma

Open weights

GPT-4

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 9B was released on 2024-06-27, while GPT-4 was released on 2023-06-13.

Gemma 2 9B is 13 months newer than GPT-4.

Gemma 2 9B

Jun 27, 2024

2.2 years ago

1.0yr newer
GPT-4

Jun 13, 2023

3.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2022-12-31, while Gemma 2 9B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4's training data extends to 2022-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemma 2 9B's cutoff date.

Gemma 2 9B

GPT-4

Dec 2022

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 2 9B and GPT-4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 2 9B
✓ Preferred
GPT-4
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 9B vs GPT-4.

Which is better, Gemma 2 9B or GPT-4?

GPT-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 2 9B is made by Google and GPT-4 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 2 9B compare to GPT-4 in benchmarks?

Gemma 2 9B scores ARC-E: 88.0%, BoolQ: 84.2%, HellaSwag: 81.9%, PIQA: 81.7%, Winogrande: 80.6%. GPT-4 scores AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC): 96.3%, HellaSwag: 95.3%, Uniform Bar Exam: 90.0%, SAT Math: 89.0%, LSAT: 88.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 2 9B and GPT-4?

Gemma 2 9B supports an unknown number of tokens and GPT-4 supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 2 9B and GPT-4?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 2 9B and GPT-4?

Gemma 2 9B is developed by Google and GPT-4 is developed by OpenAI.